VOC stands for Voice of the Customer, and it is kind of a big deal.
When we talk about Lean enterprises, and their sister Lean Six Sigma enterprises, we’re talking about value-added production.
Value-added means production that incurs cost that can be passed on to the customer, or in other words, that creates value for the customer.
This process can’t be based on guesswork.
Some waste (waste is the opposite of value-added production) can be easily detected.
Waste events that occur as a result of failing to produce value for the customer can be harder to anticipate without a clear plan and information concerning the needs and expectations of customers.
Where does this information come from?
From the customers themselves.
A developed process for gathering information that reflects the Voice of the Customer is essential to understanding what features a design team should focus on (this applies to both products and services) and how production (or the execution of a service) should produce these features.
Customer Segmentation Is Key
Before asking your customers about their needs, it is important to remember that not all customers are created equal.
Customer segmentation is an important part of identifying who will be asked which questions; some customers are more valuable than others.
Properly segmented customers will have questions tailored to their characteristics.
Some examples of segments are B2B customers, B2C customers, those who are segmented geographically, by gender, by enterprise size, etc. Keep this data in mind when analyzing the final results.
For example, if customers from a specific geographic region consistently ask for a specific feature, while customers from another do not, this information can be used to inform distribution and production operations.
Gathering Effective VOC Data
Traditional VOC data-gathering efforts revolve around a few basic gathering methods:
- Point-of-Use Observation
- Focus Groups
Each of these methods each have strengths and weaknesses, particularly when you’re looking at the extensiveness or completeness of the data provided versus cost.
An effective VOC data-gathering effort should use multiple forms of data gathering to capitalize on the strengths of each form, cost permitting.
Interviews are great ways to get in-depth insight through open-ended questions.
They also offer unique perspectives that simply cannot be gleaned from observation or surveys.
These perspectives are presented in the customers’ own words and reflect their thoughts and opinions. On the downside, interviews are costly and require a high degree of planning and organization.
Point-of-use observation offers a slightly less in-depth look at customer preferences than interviewing those customers, but it is often slightly more cost-effective. One observer can report back many observations, instead of collecting information from one person at a time.
Point-of-use observation is also a good collection method because it provides insight about the ways in which customers use products “in their natural environment” so to speak. This is insight that may be lost in an interview setting and is hard to come by through surveys.
Focus groups are also a much more cost-effective way to gather VOC data than interviews.
The ratio of data collector to customer is much lower, so, like point-of-use observation collection, a single collector may be able to gather data from multiple customers faster than doing interviews.
Like interviews, focus group data gathering produces deeper insight than surveys or observation, and it has the added benefit of several different views being presented simultaneously.
These groups can all be part of a single segment, or they may be mixed segments, further increasing the variety of unique perspectives presented.
The drawback, however, is that within a focus group setting it can be difficult to dive deeper into information provided by individuals.
The most cost-effective method of VOC data collection is, far and away, surveys.
Customer surveys can be sent to forty customers or four thousand for relatively low cost. They have the ability to reach customers that would otherwise prove impractical to interview or observe, and with the aid of surveying software, questions can be tailored to various customer segments.
But what really sets surveys apart is that they provide mountains of quantitative data.
While other forms of VOC data collection provide qualitative or non-numerical data in most cases, surveys are ideally suited to be crunched through statistical programs.
The drawback, of course, is that surveys don’t provide the same level of insight as observation or interviews, and they can be impersonal.
Plus, surveys tend to yield only the information that is requested, whereas an interview may uncover insight that the data collector never expected.
The Key Is Variety – and Refinement
Knowing where each method excels and where it comes up short should make it clear that the best VOC data collection results come from VOC efforts that use a variety of collection methods.
To help you decipher which methods are best for you, here is a handy chart that compares each of the collection types:
All of this information is important, but one of the most important aspects to remember is that the information provided by VOC data collection efforts must be actionable.
This often means refining questions and objectives to elicit the “best” answers from customers.
This doesn’t mean introducing bias into the results, but it does mean getting past some of the communication issues that may present themselves that can make collected data less than useful.
Take a look at the following example of a customer’s answer to a question about a product.
“I feel like I’m not getting a good value.”
There is not any solid information in that statement.
Value implies price-related concerns perhaps, but there’s nothing to go on.
VOC data collectors should be pondering how they can coax more information out of customers. After a follow-up, that statement can evolve into something like this:
“I feel like I’m not getting a good value because the price of this product is not competitive.”
That’s better, but it still leaves a lot of room for interpretation. Competitive compared to what, and what would be a good value?
“I feel like I’m not getting a good value because the price of this product is not competitive. It is higher than the price of a comparable product by nearly 20 percent.”
The third iteration of that sentence tells us something we need to know, and it provides a quantifiable piece of information as well.
Whether or not the organization acts on this information by decreasing the price is up to the decision makers, but in this aspect, the VOC data collection will have done its job.
The Bottom Line
The bottom line is that VOC collection methods are too important to your organization (Lean, Lean Six Sigma, or otherwise) to perform incorrectly.
As wide a variety of data-gathering methods should be used as is possible on your organization’s VOC budget, and follow-ups should be made where necessary.
The overall goal of a VOC collection effort should be to obtain actionable information, the kind that can inform production in meaningful ways.
They are your customers, after all; it’s probably a good idea to listen to them.
Do you have some nifty tips and tricks to share when it comes to refining your questions to get better answers? Let us know in the comments.
Benjamin Sweeney is the Senior Business Writer for ClydeBank Media who specializes in the wide and wonderful world of business and process optimization. He has an appetite for waste reduction and an eye for efficiency. He has authored two titles on the subject of Lean manufacturing, both available from ClydeBank Media.